Empowering businesses to reduce their carbon footprint through AI-powered insights and automated sustainability reporting.
Karel Maly
September 18, 2025
The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is about to change the game for how Czech companies handle their ESG reporting, and the 2025 deadline is fast approaching. This isn’t just another piece of red tape. It's a fundamental shift, and this guide is here to give you a clear, practical roadmap to get you ready. We'll walk through the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), explain who needs to report when, and clarify exactly what you need to do to be prepared.
If you’re used to the old Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), get ready for a significant upgrade. The CSRD demands far more in both scope and detail. It’s no longer enough to publish a separate sustainability report; now, this detailed, audited data must be woven directly into your company's management report. For many businesses, 2025 is the year all this theory gets very real.
This timeline gives you a bird's-eye view of the key milestones on the road to the mandatory 2025 reporting deadline.
As you can see, this has been a deliberate, multi-year rollout. The EU is serious about making sustainability reporting just as rigorous and standardised as financial accounting.
The CSRD is being introduced in phases, so not everyone has to report at the same time. The first wave, reporting in 2025 on their 2024 financial year, consists of large "public interest entities" that were already covered by the NFRD.
This group primarily includes:
But the big expansion happens next. The reporting on the 2025 financial year is where the CSRD’s net widens significantly here in the Czech Republic. While the initial group was relatively small, the next phase will pull in thousands more. Estimates suggest that over 50,000 European companies will be gearing up to prepare their first CSRD-compliant reports. This is a massive shift.
To give a clearer picture of who is affected and when, here’s a breakdown of the reporting deadlines specifically for Czech companies.
Reporting Year (Financial Year) | Company Type Subject to Reporting | First Report Due |
---|---|---|
2024 | Large public-interest entities (over 500 employees) already subject to the NFRD. | In 2025 |
2025 | All other large companies meeting 2 of 3 criteria: >250 employees, >€40M turnover, >€20M total assets. | In 2026 |
2026 | Listed SMEs (except micro-undertakings), small and non-complex credit institutions, and captive insurance undertakings. | In 2027 |
2028 | Non-EU undertakings with net turnover over €150M in the EU and at least one subsidiary/branch in the Union. | In 2029 |
This phased approach gives different types of companies time to prepare, but as you can see, the deadlines are coming up quickly for a huge number of businesses.
At the very core of the CSRD are the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). These are the detailed rules that spell out exactly what you need to disclose. We’ve moved past vague policies and into the world of granular, auditable data.
A concept you need to understand right away is the double materiality assessment. This is a complete departure from older reporting styles. It forces you to look at sustainability from two directions:
Your double materiality assessment is what determines which ESRS topics and data points are relevant for you to report on. Nailing this process is non-negotiable for a compliant and genuinely useful report. To get a better handle on this, take a look at our guide on how to enhance ESG data and investor confidence with proven strategies.
The double materiality principle is a fundamental departure from traditional reporting. It requires companies to look both inward at financial risks and outward at their societal and environmental footprint, creating a holistic view of performance and responsibility.
As you start plotting out your compliance journey, it helps to see what has worked for others. Looking at examples of effective implementation plans can give you a solid framework for building your own CSRD roadmap. This initial groundwork is vital for creating a process that not only meets the requirements but is also manageable for your team year after year.
Successfully navigating CSRD compliance isn't a job you can delegate to a single department. Thinking of this as a task just for finance or sustainability is a common first mistake. What you’re really doing is building the human infrastructure for a permanent new business function.
Your success in meeting the 2025 CSRD deadline starts with assembling a dedicated, cross-functional team. This group will be the engine driving everything from data collection to final reporting, and it needs a diverse mix of skills from all corners of your company.
A solid CSRD project team needs both high-level strategic oversight and practical, on-the-ground knowledge. No single person or department has all the answers, so you'll need to pull together representatives from several key areas.
Your first move should be to appoint a strong Project Lead or CSRD Champion. This person doesn't need to be a sustainability guru, but they absolutely must have the project management chops and internal authority to push the initiative forward, secure the necessary resources, and hold everyone accountable.
Once you have a leader, it’s time to build out the team with people from these critical business units:
A great team can only get so far without a clear governance structure. This framework is what creates accountability, provides proper oversight, and truly embeds CSRD compliance into your company culture. Without it, you risk confusion and stalled progress.
First things first: secure Executive Sponsorship. You need a C-suite executive or board member who will actively champion the project. Their job is to advocate for the initiative at the highest levels, knock down organisational roadblocks, and communicate its strategic importance to the entire company. This top-down support is absolutely essential.
With that in place, you need to formalise the oversight.
A dedicated CSRD Steering Committee, made up of senior leaders from the departments on your project team, should be created. This committee's job is to review progress, approve major decisions—like the results of your materiality assessment—and give the final sign-off on the report.
This structure creates a clear chain of command and ensures that big decisions are made with the whole business in mind. I've seen this work best when the committee meets regularly—maybe quarterly while you're getting set up, then twice a year once things are running smoothly. This proactive rhythm helps maintain momentum and lets you tackle challenges before they become crises. It turns CSRD from a last-minute annual scramble into a well-managed function that genuinely adds value.
Let's get straight to the point: the double materiality assessment is the absolute cornerstone of your CSRD journey. If you get this piece wrong, the rest of your report is built on a house of cards. This isn't just a box-ticking exercise; it’s a rigorous investigation that dictates the entire scope of your reporting.
At its heart, the assessment demands you look at your business through two different lenses. You're forced to analyse your company from the inside-out (your impact on the world) and the outside-in (the world's impact on your bottom line). It’s a foundational step in any practical CSRD compliance guide 2025 because it connects your operations to the real world in a way traditional financial reporting never has.
The "double" in double materiality simply refers to these two distinct, yet connected, viewpoints. You have to run every potential sustainability topic through both filters to see what sticks.
A topic becomes material, and thus reportable, if it’s significant from either or both of these perspectives. For instance, a Czech manufacturing firm’s high energy consumption is material from an impact angle (hello, GHG emissions) and a financial one (skyrocketing energy bills and looming carbon taxes).
One of the most common pitfalls I see is companies focusing only on what happens within their own four walls. The CSRD is explicit: you must look at your entire value chain, from your raw material suppliers right through to your end-users.
Start by sketching this out. If you’re a Czech automotive supplier, this means looking far beyond your own factory gates.
This 360-degree view almost always uncovers significant impacts and risks that were previously off the radar. It's a complex undertaking, there's no doubt about it, but it is absolutely non-negotiable for a compliant assessment.
Your materiality assessment isn't a one-and-done checkbox. It is a living process that should be revisited regularly as stakeholder expectations, regulations, and your own business model evolve. An auditor will want to see a clear, documented methodology that you can defend.
You simply cannot conduct a materiality assessment in a vacuum. To get a true picture, you have to talk to people. Engaging a broad cross-section of stakeholders is the only way to genuinely identify what they deem important.
Your list of stakeholders should be comprehensive:
The goal here isn't just to have conversations; it's to gather structured, defensible feedback. Use tools like surveys, one-on-one interviews, and workshops to truly understand their priorities when it comes to your social and environmental performance.
A logistics company in Prague, for example, might find that while investors are laser-focused on fleet emissions (financial materiality), the local residents are far more concerned with noise pollution and traffic from delivery trucks (impact materiality). Both points are valid, and both must be fed into your assessment. This structured feedback becomes the evidence that justifies why you’ve prioritised certain topics over others—a crucial part of your audit trail.
Once you've figured out what’s material to your business, the real heavy lifting begins. You’re now faced with the enormous task of gathering all the data required to report on those topics. Let’s be frank: CSRD demands a level of detail and verifiability that most companies' current systems were never designed for.
If you’re still relying on spreadsheets and manual data entry, you’re in for a rough ride. That approach is slow, riddled with errors, and an absolute nightmare when the auditors come knocking. It’s simply not a viable option anymore.
This is where you start building the technical backbone of your compliance project. You need to create a data ecosystem that is robust, efficient, and, most importantly, audit-proof. The goal isn't just to collect information; it's to manage, validate, and centralise it into a single source of truth for all your sustainability metrics.
Before you rush out and invest in shiny new software, take a breath. The first, most critical step is to understand what you already have and—more importantly—what you’re missing. A gap analysis will pinpoint the specific weak spots in your current data setup. Don't skip this; I’ve seen companies waste significant time and money by buying a solution before they truly understood their problem.
Start by mapping out the specific data points required by the ESRS topics from your double materiality assessment. For every single data point, you need to ask:
This exercise will quickly show you where your biggest headaches are. A classic example I've seen is a logistics company that tracks its own fleet's fuel consumption perfectly in its ERP but has zero visibility into the emissions from its third-party carriers. Under CSRD, that's a massive gap that needs to be closed.
With a clear picture of your data gaps, you can now start looking at solutions. Your choice will generally fall into one of two camps: adapting what you already have or adopting something new.
For some, simply enhancing an existing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system with a sustainability module might do the trick. This can work if your data needs are relatively straightforward and mostly confined to your own operations.
However, for most companies dealing with complex value chains, a specialised ESG or carbon management platform is the smarter, more effective path. These platforms are purpose-built to handle the unique messiness of sustainability data. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which is now in effect for fiscal years starting in 2024, requires large Czech companies to produce data-driven reports aligned with European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). For a deep dive into the technical specifics, you can read the full research about ESRS compliance requirements.
A dedicated ESG platform is so much more than a database. A good one will offer automated data ingestion, validation engines to catch errors, and pre-built reporting templates that align directly with ESRS disclosure requirements. Trust me, this will make your life infinitely easier come audit season.
Putting a new system in place is only half the battle. You also need a solid strategy for managing the data that flows into it. This is a crucial part of any successful CSRD compliance guide 2025, because poor data management can completely derail your reporting efforts.
Here are a few strategies I always recommend:
Building this infrastructure might feel like a daunting project, but it’s a necessary investment. Getting your data management right is the foundation for achieving compliance and, beyond that, for unlocking the real strategic value hidden in your sustainability performance. For more on this, check out our guide to sustainability data management software. An efficient data ecosystem doesn’t just keep you out of trouble with regulators; it gives you the insights you need to make smarter, more sustainable business decisions.
After months of wrangling data, engaging with stakeholders, and getting systems up to scratch, the finish line is finally in sight. Now comes the critical part: assembling everything into a cohesive, compliant, and—most importantly—audit-ready CSRD report. This is where all your hard work pays off, turning raw data into a compelling narrative that will hold up under close inspection.
The first major technical hurdle you’ll face is the mandatory digital tagging. CSRD requires your report to be machine-readable, meaning all your sustainability information needs to be marked up using Inline XBRL (iXBRL). This isn't just some formatting quirk; it’s a core requirement designed to make sustainability data just as searchable and comparable as financial figures.
Think of XBRL tagging as giving every piece of sustainability data a unique digital barcode. This lets regulators, investors, and analysts pull specific information automatically, without having to sift through hundreds of pages. For your 2025 submission, you’ll be applying tags from the ESRS Taxonomy directly to your disclosures.
In practice, this involves a few key tasks:
Honestly, many companies opt to work with a specialised service provider for this. The technical expertise needed is pretty significant, and getting it right from the start ensures your report is accepted by the relevant business register without any hiccups.
Your CSRD report shouldn't be a disjointed collection of data tables and policy statements. It needs to be integrated directly into your annual management report, telling one unified story about your company's performance, strategy, and real-world impacts. The best reports connect the dots for the reader.
For instance, if your double materiality assessment identified water scarcity as a material financial risk, your report should then clearly detail the specific water-saving initiatives you've launched. Go further and show the capital you've allocated to them. This creates a powerful narrative that demonstrates foresight and proves you're managing risks proactively.
Remember, your CSRD report is far more than a compliance document; it’s a strategic communication tool. It’s your chance to show investors, customers, and regulators that sustainability is genuinely embedded in your business model, not just a box-ticking exercise.
As you get closer to finalising everything, using an ultimate audit readiness checklist can be a lifesaver for making sure all your documentation and processes are properly in order.
For the first time, your sustainability report is going to face a mandatory audit. While it’s termed "limited assurance"—less intensive than a full financial audit—it’s far from a simple check. Auditors will be looking for clear, tangible evidence to back up every single claim you make.
To prepare for this, you need to start thinking like an auditor. Organise your evidence meticulously. For every key data point, from Scope 1 emissions to employee turnover rates, you must have a clear audit trail that shows:
All this documentation should be centralised and easy for an auditor to access. A common weak spot auditors will probe is your value chain data. If you're relying on information from suppliers, be ready to show how you've validated its accuracy. This is where robust data management becomes non-negotiable, and why many organisations look into how to produce automated sustainability reports for ESG compliance.
While the EU sets the directive, keep in mind that national implementation can vary. As of April 2025, the Czech Republic is still in the process of finalising its legislative alignment with CSRD timelines. This delay prompted the European Commission to initiate infringement proceedings back in September 2024. Although the Ministry of Finance has listed the companies obligated to report, the complete enforcement framework is still taking shape, which really just highlights the need to be prepared. Being audit-ready from day one protects you from potential penalties and, more importantly, builds critical trust with all your stakeholders.
Getting ready for the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive can feel like navigating a maze. Even with a good plan, tricky questions always pop up. Here, I'll tackle some of the most common queries we're hearing from Czech companies as they gear up for their first reporting cycle in 2025.
My goal is to give you straightforward, practical answers to help you clear any hurdles and press on with confidence.
Hands down, the single biggest challenge for most businesses is the double materiality assessment. This isn’t just a new piece of jargon; it’s a complete shift in how we think about what’s important. We’re moving away from simply reporting what we think matters to a much more rigorous process driven by stakeholder feedback and a deep look at our entire value chain.
You're essentially forced to look through two lenses at once. First, you have to assess your "inside-out" impact – how your operations affect people and the planet. At the same time, you need to analyse the "outside-in" view – how sustainability issues create very real financial risks and opportunities for your company.
Pulling this off is a major undertaking. It demands serious engagement with your stakeholders, close collaboration between departments that might not usually talk to each other, and a clear, transparent methodology you can stand behind. Getting this foundational step right is absolutely critical, because its findings will define the entire scope of your report and will be scrutinised by auditors.
The double materiality assessment is far more than a box-ticking exercise; it's a strategic deep-dive. It forces you to honestly evaluate your company's place in the world, connecting your operational footprint to your financial health in a way that's completely new for most.
This process is exactly what sets the CSRD apart from the more voluntary reporting frameworks of the past.
This is a great question, especially for companies that have already put time and effort into sustainability reporting. The good news is that the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) didn't reinvent the wheel. They worked hard to ensure the new European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) are highly interoperable with established global frameworks.
If your team has experience with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), you've got a massive head start. There’s a huge amount of overlap in topics and the specific data points required. In fact, EFRAG has even published detailed mapping tables to help you translate your existing GRI work directly into ESRS requirements.
But here’s the crucial part: CSRD is not optional. It’s the law, and it comes with specific demands that go beyond what voluntary standards ask for. You can't just swap one for the other. Key differences include:
Think of your past work with GRI or SASB as a fantastic foundation. It gives you a solid base to build on, but it’s not a substitute for full ESRS compliance.
The fine print is still being finalised in Czech law, but the directive itself is very clear. It instructs member states to implement sanctions that are "effective, proportionate, and dissuasive." That’s EU-speak for: "this will hurt."
Looking at the directive's language and what’s happening in other EU countries, we can expect a mix of penalties.
Most likely, this will include:
But honestly, the direct legal penalties might not even be the worst of it. The indirect consequences—like losing investor confidence, damaging your brand's reputation, or finding it harder to secure loans—could inflict far more lasting harm on your business. The only sensible approach is to assume the penalties will be significant and prepare accordingly.
Wrangling all the data needed for CSRD reporting is a huge task. Carbonpunk offers an AI-driven platform that automates emissions tracking across your entire supply chain, giving you the accurate, audit-ready data you need for full compliance. See how our solution can make your 2025 reporting process much smoother at https://www.carbonpunk.ai/en.